Central arguments and theoretical underpinnings: Grade 1 = Well-defined argument and challenging thesis. Very sound theoretical underpinnings |
|
Central arguments and theoretical underpinnings: Grade 2 = Acceptable argument and thesis. Reasonable theoretical underpinnings |
|
Central arguments and theoretical underpinnings: Grade 3 = Argument, thesis, or theoretical underpinning badly flawed. |
|
Central arguments grade: |
|
|
Contributions to the field: Grade 1 = Original and important contribution to the relevant sub-field(s) |
|
Contributions to the field: Grade 2 = Sufficient acknowledgement and/or implied awareness of relevant sub-field(s). |
|
Contributions to the field: Grade 3 = Not sufficiently in conversation with relevant sub-field(s) |
|
Contributions to the field grade: |
|
|
Quality of writing and other elements of execution: Grade 1 = Impressive writing and overall execution |
|
Quality of writing and other elements of execution: Grade 2 = Satisfactory writing and overall execution |
|
Quality of writing and other elements of execution: Grade 3 = Unsatisfactory writing or overall execution |
|
Qual. of writing and execution grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall thesis grade (1-3): |
|